Simple and flexible YAML ext_pillar which can read pillar from within pillar.
New in version 2016.3.0.
This custom saltstack ext_pillar
is a direct ripoff of the 'stack'
ext_pillar, simply ported to use mako instead of jinja2 for templating.
It supports the following features:
multiple config files that are mako templates with support for pillar
,
__grains__
, __salt__
, __opts__
objects.
a config file renders as an ordered list of files. Unless absolute, the paths of these files are relative to the current config file - if absolute, they will be treated literally.
this list of files are read in order as mako templates with support for
stack
, pillar
, __grains__
, __salt__
, __opts__
objects.
all these rendered files are then parsed as yaml
.
then all yaml dicts are merged in order, with support for the following.
merging strategies: merge-first
, merge-last
, remove
, and
overwrite
.
stack config files can be matched based on pillar
, grains
, or
opts
values, which make it possible to support kind of self-contained
environments.
Like any other external pillar, its configuration takes place through the
ext_pillar
key in the master config file.
However, you can configure MakoStack in 3 different ways:
This is the simplest option, you just need to set the path to your single MakoStack config file like below:
ext_pillar:
- makostack: /path/to/stack.cfg
You can also provide a list of config files:
ext_pillar:
- makostack:
- /path/to/stack1.cfg
- /path/to/stack2.cfg
You can also opt for a much more flexible configuration: MakoStack allows one to select the config files for the current minion based on matching values from either grains, or pillar, or opts objects.
Here is an example of such a configuration, which should speak by itself:
ext_pillar:
- makostack:
pillar:environment:
dev: /path/to/dev/stack.cfg
prod: /path/to/prod/stack.cfg
grains:custom:grain:
value:
- /path/to/stack1.cfg
- /path/to/stack2.cfg
opts:custom:opt:
value: /path/to/stack0.cfg
An extended syntax for config files permits defining "graft points" on a per-config-file basis. As an example, if the file foo.cfg would produce the following:
foo:
- bar
- baz
and you specified the cfg file as /path/to/foo.cfg:yummy:fur, the following would actually end up in pillar after all merging was complete:
yummy:
fur:
foo:
- bar
- baz
The config files that are referenced in the above ext_pillar
configuration
are mako templates which must render as a simple ordered list of yaml
files that will then be merged to build pillar data.
Unless an absolute path name is specified, the path of these yaml
files is
assumed to be relative to the directory containing the MakoStack config file.
If a path begins with '/', however, it will be treated literally and can be
anywhere on the filesystem.
The following variables are available in mako templating of makostack configuration files:
pillar
: the pillar data (as passed by Salt to our ext_pillar
function)
minion_id
: the minion id ;-)
__opts__
: a dictionary of mostly Salt configuration options
__grains__
: a dictionary of the grains of the minion making this pillar
call
__salt__
: a dictionary of Salt module functions, useful so you don't have
to duplicate functions that already exist (note: runs on the master)
So you can use all the power of mako to build your list of yaml
files
that will be merged in pillar data.
For example, you could have a MakoStack config file which looks like:
$ cat /path/to/stack/config.cfg
core.yml
osarchs/%{ __grains__['osarch'] }}.yml
oscodenames/%{ __grains__['oscodename'] }.yml
% for role in pillar.get('roles', []):
roles/%{ role }.yml
% endfor
minions/%{ minion_id }.yml
And the whole directory structure could look like:
$ tree /path/to/stack/
/path/to/stack/
├── config.cfg
├── core.yml
├── osarchs/
│ ├── amd64.yml
│ └── armhf.yml
├── oscodenames/
│ ├── wheezy.yml
│ └── jessie.yml
├── roles/
│ ├── web.yml
│ └── db.yml
└── minions/
├── test-1-dev.yml
└── test-2-dev.yml
In the above MakoStack configuration, given that test-1-dev minion is an
amd64 platform running Debian Jessie, and which pillar roles
is ["db"]
,
the following yaml
files would be merged in order:
core.yml
osarchs/amd64.yml
oscodenames/jessie.yml
roles/db.yml
minions/test-1-dev.yml
Before merging, every files above will be preprocessed as mako templates.
The following variables are available in mako templating of yaml
files:
stack
: the MakoStack pillar data object that has currently been merged
(data from previous yaml
files in MakoStack configuration)
pillar
: the pillar data (as passed by Salt to our ext_pillar
function)
minion_id
: the minion id ;-)
__opts__
: a dictionary of mostly Salt configuration options
__grains__
: a dictionary of the grains of the minion making this pillar
call
__salt__
: a dictionary of Salt module functions, useful so you don't have
to duplicate functions that already exist (note: runs on the master)
So you can use all the power of mako to build your pillar data, and even use
other pillar values that has already been merged by MakoStack (from previous
yaml
files in MakoStack configuration) through the stack
variable.
Once a yaml
file has been preprocessed by mako, we obtain a Python dict -
let's call it yml_data
- then, MakoStack will merge this yml_data
dict in the main stack
dict (which contains already merged MakoStack
pillar data).
By default, MakoStack will deeply merge yml_data
in stack
(similarly
to the recurse
salt pillar_source_merging_strategy
), but 3 merging
strategies are currently available for you to choose (see next section).
Once every yaml
files have been processed, the stack
dict will contain
your whole own pillar data, merged in order by MakoStack.
So MakoStack ext_pillar
returns the stack
dict, the contents of which
Salt takes care to merge in with all of the other pillars and finally return
the whole pillar to the minion.
The way the data from a new yaml_data
dict is merged with the existing
stack
data can be controlled by specifying a merging strategy. Right now
this strategy can either be merge-last
(the default), merge-first
,
remove
, or overwrite
.
Note that scalar values like strings, integers, booleans, etc. are always
evaluated using the overwrite
strategy (other strategies don't make sense
in that case).
The merging strategy can be set by including a dict in the form of:
__: <merging strategy>
as the first item of the dict or list. This allows fine grained control over the merging process.
merge-last
(default) strategy¶If the merge-last
strategy is selected (the default), then content of dict
or list variables is merged recursively with previous definitions of this
variable (similarly to the recurse
salt
pillar_source_merging_strategy
).
This allows for extending previously defined data.
merge-first
strategy¶If the merge-first
strategy is selected, then the content of dict or list
variables are swapped between the yaml_data
and stack
objects before
being merged recursively with the merge-last
previous strategy.
remove
strategy¶If the remove
strategy is selected, then content of dict or list variables
in stack
are removed only if the corresponding item is present in the
yaml_data
dict.
This allows for removing items from previously defined data.
overwrite
strategy¶If the overwrite
strategy is selected, then the content of dict or list
variables in stack
is overwritten by the content of yaml_data
dict.
So this allows one to overwrite variables from previous definitions.
Let's go through small examples that should clarify what's going on when a
yaml_data
dict is merged in the stack
dict.
When you don't specify any strategy, the default merge-last
strategy is
selected:
|
|
|
---|---|---|
users:
tom:
uid: 500
roles:
- sysadmin
root:
uid: 0
|
users:
tom:
uid: 1000
roles:
- developer
mat:
uid: 1001
|
users:
tom:
uid: 1000
roles:
- sysadmin
- developer
mat:
uid: 1001
root:
uid: 0
|
Then you can select a custom merging strategy using the __
key in a dict:
|
|
|
---|---|---|
users:
tom:
uid: 500
roles:
- sysadmin
root:
uid: 0
|
users:
__: merge-last
tom:
uid: 1000
roles:
- developer
mat:
uid: 1001
|
users:
tom:
uid: 1000
roles:
- sysadmin
- developer
mat:
uid: 1001
root:
uid: 0
|
users:
tom:
uid: 500
roles:
- sysadmin
root:
uid: 0
|
users:
__: merge-first
tom:
uid: 1000
roles:
- developer
mat:
uid: 1001
|
users:
tom:
uid: 500
roles:
- developer
- sysadmin
mat:
uid: 1001
root:
uid: 0
|
users:
tom:
uid: 500
roles:
- sysadmin
root:
uid: 0
|
users:
__: remove
tom:
mat:
|
users:
root:
uid: 0
|
users:
tom:
uid: 500
roles:
- sysadmin
root:
uid: 0
|
users:
__: overwrite
tom:
uid: 1000
roles:
- developer
mat:
uid: 1001
|
users:
tom:
uid: 1000
roles:
- developer
mat:
uid: 1001
|
You can also select a custom merging strategy using a __
object in a list:
|
|
|
---|---|---|
users:
- tom
- root
|
users:
- __: merge-last
- mat
|
users:
- tom
- root
- mat
|
users:
- tom
- root
|
users:
- __: merge-first
- mat
|
users:
- mat
- tom
- root
|
users:
- tom
- root
|
users:
- __: remove
- mat
- tom
|
users:
- root
|
users:
- tom
- root
|
users:
- __: overwrite
- mat
|
users:
- mat
|